Sunglasses: fashionable accessory v. multi-use efficiency

Its almost summer time, and I am here to forewarn anyone looking to purchase sunglasses. When I think of sungalsses I imagine my favorite pairs (at least for now...) and I fairly consistent. My favorites are sunglasses with large lenses and dark tints similar to those in the picture. But honestly sunglasses are a very personal thing, like jeans. Although you may love a certain brand, they just have to fit you properly. Everyone's face is different in its shape and dimensions, and we must find a pair of "shades" that fit correctly. So we can search through the endless catalogues and go from store to store but I just ask one favor... DONT be suckered in by the salespeople.

Every sales person is going to try to explain that if you don't have 20/20 you should try the photochromatic glasses. This term refers to a specific chemical reaction the lenses have to ultra violet radiation. This reaction causes the lenses to transform from transparent to tinted, similar to a light pair of sunglasses. As cost efficient and convenient as this may seem, please don't be suckered into the sale! There is nothing attractive about a person wearing reading glasses with tint! I understand they are extremely high-tech and it would seem cool to have the latest device, especially glasses that transform, but they are not beach-approved at all!!

There is a definite difference between the glasses that are acceptable for the day and for being able to see, and the glasses that are accetable for the sun. Refer back to the picture above, and imagine it with a clear lens and a person using them to read in a library...bizarre right. The person would seem as though they are stuck in the '80's. Yet they are a completely acceptable frame for the outdoors and sun. Now notice the picture below and see how this frame is more of the indoor acceptable frame.

The answer to that question is because we are keeping the distinction between the lenses!!! Anyone that tries to tell you that your reading glasses can also be used as your "weekend shades" is seriously trying to impair your social life. Just because the tint on the photochromatic glasses becomes darker doesn't mean they are approved for outdoor and beach use!

So I'm sorry to say the high tech version of this comparison is a fail!! please stick to the older version of having prescription reading glasses and separate prescription beach-approved glasses. Its the only way to go!! So summer here we come!!

Athletic Entertainment: CDplayer v. iPod

Yes, yes I know to a younger or more tech savvy reader this comparison seems rather ridiculous. Who would actually attempt any physical activity and try to listen to a CD player?? Well it has happend, and I am a witness! I was at the gym last night and to my disbelief saw a man of about 45-50 years old with his CD player clipped to his gym shorts. After the shock wore off, I wondered if he had ever been introduced to and ipod or if he had chosen to stick with the CD player. So I had to know, and used a combination of a sweet and curious tone with the excuse of a school research project to get my answer. And his response was "oh yea those little music sticks? I just dont understand how they work, and my CD palyer has never failed me!" I acknowleged his answer outloud, but was still in disbelief.

I understand some peoeple's fear of ipods because they think itunes, the program on which it runs, is a complicated computer and music program that has wayyy too many options. But in reality the necessary options are simple and direct. Granted not as simple as - insert CD, play CD - but it does come rather close! One who wants a CD's music to play on their ipod simply has to insert the CD into thier computer; open the itunes program; and select "import cd". In a matter of seconds the music will appear on your itunes and then can be transfered to your ipod.

There are hundreds of reasons for a person to choose an ipod over a cd player for normal music use. But when we are discussing the benefits for a person who wishes to listen to music and do any athletic simultaneously, the benefits skyrocket! Even the idea of running while holding a CD player should send chills down any runner's back. The last thing you want when you are running that last sprint to break you personal record is a heavy CD player in one hand! An iPod on the other hand is light weight and about half the size of a a dollar bill. Apart from being small, the iPod can now be strapped to your upper arm using a velcro strap that is sold separately.

Also, although many people that run or excercise while listening to music have a "special mix" to get them pumped for the workout, others dont. If you dont have this specialized list of music, you might enjoy a wide range of music and desire to hear it all. With a CD player this would entail lugging all or most of your CDs with you, interrupting the workout to change a CD and replacing the CD in whatever storage it came in. On the other hand an ipod can hold a ridiculous amount of music, probably more than you can listen to in six months of continuous workouts! And it is all kept in the small device that is a fraction of the size and weight of a CD player.

Best of all an ipod never SKIPS! If you have owned a CD player and used it anywhere besides resting it on a steady table, you must agree that too much movement will make the CD skip. Unless your workouts are very relaxing, they inlcude A LOT of movement, running, jumping etc. Therefore, your CD is most likely to skip throughout the entire workout. An ipod would solve this problem and you can run, jump, adn skip till your heart is content!

There is no reason why in this day and age an athlete should want to use an CD player, instead of an ipod. So if you have not purchased an ipod yet, you should defintly go do it and see the incredible difference it makes in your next workout!!

Social Networking

Live Social Networking v. Internet Social Networking

Is the internet taking over our social networking? It seems that people communicate more through social networking sites that through actual person-to-person communication.


Social networking has burden society for centuries. "Why did I say that?"or "Oh why didnt I think before I blurted that out" "what did he say his name was?" are usually thoughts that race through a person's mind in some social networking events. Then with the advent of the internet accessible social networking sites came the a much easier version of networking minus the possibilities of awkward silence, mumbling, or saying the wrong thing. It seems that Facebook, for example, simplifies the hassle of social networking. It allows you to keep connections alive from the comfort of your very own home, as without the call and/or extremely awkward voice message. A simple "just wanted to stop and say hi!" on a friend's Facebook page is sufficient. There is also something about typing the words out that as opposed to blurting them out, that makes you think about them a little longer. It seems that Facebook provides a much more polished and measured expression of yourself that might be lost in conversation.


The downfalls of using this as your only or main means of social networking are far more than the benefits. The ease and comfort of Facebook are sometimes the reason why it replaces some people's complete social lives. THIS IS A HUGE MISTAKE. There are certain things that you just cannot get over the internet, and overuse of this form of social networking might hinder your social skills more than help them. Some young adults update their Facebook status more than they speak to their friends or parents. This can cause major developmental defects and flaws because they become computer hermits and loose their skill in actual live conversation. in adults this can also have the same effects, by hindering further social skills and might even create a social block where they may feel incapable of handling "live" social events.






Some people use Facebook to not only maintain their current friends, but also to meet new people. Facebook has several applications in which is suggests friends according to "mutual friends" or "similar likes" or "similar networks" such as schools or universities. Personally it seems odd that I should meet someone because a computer generated program thinks that we might either get along or be friends because we have 10 friends in common. I much prefer the old-fashioned way of meeting friends, through class, parties or actually being introduced through our mutual friends. Yet Facebook has intentionally covered all those bases in thier applications, in an attempt to completely simulate the real world, and many people fall into the trap.


DONT LET THIS HAPPEN TO YOU! Please continue to go out, and meet friend's friends; meet your classmates in person and don't depend on Facebook to suggest those friendships to you. Much of the purpose and benefit of social networking is in the actual "social" aspect. Don't be fooled by the title of Facebook as a "social-networking website" because there is nothing social about sitting in your room in your pajamas, and typing on a friend's wall on Facebook.


GO OUT AND MEET PEOPLE!! =) I can guarantee if you go to places that play your favorite music, maintain your favorite atmosphere of people, and serve your favorite food, or attend your favorite kind of music performances you can also meet people with some of your same interests. This way you can easily bypass Facebook suggestions for friends, and find them yourself!

Road-trip: Maps v. GPS

Although reference this comparison of high-tech and low-tech with road-trips, I was inspired to compare maps and a GPS on a recent experience that was not a road-trip. I was a simple drive to a graduation party for a friend, but the location was in a distant area about 30 minutes outside of my usual commuting area. Since it was outside my area I instantly entered the address into my GPS and was on my way, (with a car full of friends that are as driving direction-challenged as I am). It seems quite obvious that my inspiration for this comparison did not come from a completely trouble-free and direct trip to the party. I knew there was probably a problem when the GPS asked me if I was "willing to travel unpaved roads?" What!?! How can this house be located on "unpaved roads" I thought, and knew we were going to have some trouble. I instantly thought it might have been easier to use the low-tech version for directions, a map.

At one time, a map was a staple in any traveling trip to a new or foreign location. It was usually something that could be found in any driver's glove compartment. The draw back was that usually a certain version or edition of a map was printed, there was a newer version in the making including additional expressways, ramps, or even exits. It seemed that no matter what you could never have a completely updated map. Also as portrayed in any camping to traveling movie, the creators/manufacturers wanted to play a cruel trick on the map buyers. It seems that they configured a way to fold the maps perfectly small and compact when they packaged them, yet made it impossible for a regular person to replicate the folding procedure. It seems that it was well known issue for any map user to re-fold the map to its original fold.

Then I must mention that in between the paper map pamphlets and the GPS, there was a craze for "map-questing" directions off of the internet before you traveled to these foreign destinations. This was a step-by-step driving direction provided on the internet that could be easily printed out. There was an obvious problem with this, and that was that if you mistyped the directions you were left driving without any way of finding the correct route. Yet, the constant printing of addresses became burdensome and wasteful, and s0 the GPS was born.

The GPS is a mini device with a touchscreen that connects to some mysterious, magical floating map database that is accessible from wherever you are (almost anywhere.).

Once it locates you you can enter you destination address and it will direct you to the destination. I have managed to find myself in locations that even the best GPS cannot locate, and it is definitely horrible to read "GPS positioning not found", but usually if you keep driving and find a main road, the GPS will reload and locate your position on the map. The GPS even has an option that it will provide the directions like "turn right in 50 yards" so that you don't have to fumble through papers while driving, if you lack a co-pilot. The GPS also refreshes your path if you miss a turn, make a wrong turn or even choose to take an expressway instead of a street path. If for some reason happen to enter the wrong address a GPS can be reset and you may re-enter the address mid drive.

The most appealing aspect of the GPS in my opinion is the fact that the GPS provides "POI" or Point of Interest locations. For example, if your are in the middle of your drive and have already devoured all the chips and mini-sandwhiches your mom, significant otehr or even you packed for the road and hunger strikes you can select a POI. A POI can be searched by the name of any food restaurant or fast food you wish to eat. The GPS will locate the closest location of that restaurant that doesnt deviate from your path.

The only downfall of the GPS is for example, what happened to me on my last excursion. It simply misdirected me. I entered the correct address, and followed all directions the GPS provided even though it said I had to travel an unpaved road, (which never arrived), and we ended up in the wrong community of houses. There is no way to correct a GPS's glitch. It is just something that comes with territory of high tech devises. But I must give it credit because it did get us to the correct area, we were only about 5 minutes from the actual destination.

It seems that as a quickly advancing technical society we have out-grown the paper maps and printable directions. The extra benefits of the GPS cannot even come close to bringing it to low level of paper maps. In this comparison, it is obvious that the better and safer choice is the GPS without a doubt!

House phone v. Cell phone

Before the days of the cell phones, and instant communication, there were only house phones. Meaning if you stepped outside, went shopping, went to work, went out of town, or did anything outside your home you seemed to be disconnected. During my lifetime, phones have gone from spin dials, to call waiting, to answer machines, and even LCD screens with caller ids. There is no denying their quick and sudden technical advancements. But it seems that even with the phones updating their technology almost yearly, they have been outdated by cell phones and their portable accessibility.

Cell phones provide all the amenities of the house phones, plus the accessibility of taking it on the go. Cell phones seem to have followed nearly the same path that house phones. Starting with phones as big and as heavy as a bricks with the most basic buttons adding incredible advancements in the blink of an eye. Cell phones added the similar additions as house phones, like caller id but also added a portable phone book which was a great asset for anyone. House phones have not (to my knowledge) added a complete phone book comparable to a cell phone. Although house phones did add speed dial which would allow the user to save a phone number to a certain number it limits the user to saving only nine numbers.

Even the most basic cell phone today can outweigh a house phone in regards to all the additional specifications it offers the users. A cell phone is much more than a cell phone providing instant assistance with a calendar or calculator. The more advanced cell phones allow internet access in any location, instant messaging, instant email updates and many more advancements that a house phone can not.

It seems cost inefficient to maintain a monthly cell phone bill as well as a house phone bill. Essentially a cell phone and a house phone provide the same basic service of a phone line to be able to make and receive calls. A cell phone can be carried to any location and making a person as available to the phone calls as they wish to be. A simple "sound off" or "silent" option allows the user to ignore the call wherever they are. The cell phone has innumerable additional applications for the user's convenience. It would just not make sense for the a person to maintain a house phone with only minimal applications, and also maintain a cell phone. Therefore, when choosing between a house phone and a cell phone, there is no question that the cell phones offer things and applications that a house phone will never be able to accomplish. A house phone will not ever be able to travel with the user, because of the very nature of the invention.

It is clear that in this selection the high tech version is the winner. If you choose to maintain a house phone you will most likely have to have a cell phone anyways, and that would be an unnecessary bill to pay. Make the cost friendly choice for yourself and buy a cell phone, and use it as your house phone as well. A phone limited to use in the house is officially outdated!!

Common Cold Remedies: Homemade or Store Bought

Lets face it, with all the advancements in the medical field blah blah blah, they still cannot come up with a cure for the common cold. Is this some kind of cruel trick or something?!?

The only thing we can do is remedy the symptoms and endure the cold as long as it may last. The low tech way to treat the common cold includes various homemade remedies while the high tech way would be to stock up on over the counter meds and possibly even a humidifier.

My grandmother (as I am sure most other are) is certain that she knows the cure to the common cold. She stresses that her homemade chicken noodle soup, and gatorade are essentials to fight any cold. Not only will the chicken soup help your symptoms, but will assist the ultimate goal of a speedy recovery. Chicken soup (made correctly with many vegetables) will provide the body with the nutrients it needs to recuperate from the cold. A canned soup might have some nutrients but wayyyy too much sodium and preservatives to be healthy! Sometimes she also recommends a rather strange method for decongesting. She puts water to boil in a large pot and then when it begins to release steam she says one should carefully lean over with a towel over your head and inhale the steam. This is suppose to have you non-congested in a matter of minutes, without hours or painful nose blowing. She also suggests drinking about half a cup of lemon or orange tea right before bed. In the morning she suggests you drink a tall glass of freshly squeezed orange juice. There are just endless little remedies to aid the symptoms with homemade concoctions as well as simultaneously supplying nutrients to aid for a speedy recovery!

Many of us in this high paced life we lead, find it very difficult to spend hours making soups or creating homemade remedies for a common cold. The are hundreds of over the counter symptom relievers that will diminish headaches, stuffy nose, sore throat, and any other symptom that may tag along. But the problem with these relievers is that they don't cure or alleviate the underlying issue, the actual immune deficiency that the cold has attacked. Therefore, it is only a minor fix that wont actually help you fight the cold.

The bottom line is that there is no comparison to an actual low tech homemade cold remedy that will aid your body in regaining control and fight that cold! There is not secret, there is not a cure to the common cold, but any of the homemade remedies will relieve the symptoms and give your body what it really needs.

Reminders: Agenda or PDA

We can all admit that we have at some point experienced that frantic panic when one realizes we have forgotten an important meeting or appointment. The question is how to fix this or completely avoid this scenario. We have two basic options, a written reminder in some sort of agenda or calendar, or a digital reminder on a PDA (personal digital assistant). Nowadays most phones are also considered PDA because of their calendar, reminder, and alarm settings and capabilities.

A written agenda is concrete an there is only one way for it to fail and that is if the owner loses it or another human error. Whatever is written in the agenda will not be accidentally deleted or erased. There is no way that an agenda will be affected with loss of battery, signal, or water damage. Although it seems archaic to actually use a pen and write something down it is a very close to full proof way to remember it. Now once it is written in the agenda, the trick is to remember to check the agenda near the crucial time of the appointment. There is no alarm that is triggered 15 minutes before your agenda's appointment. Your agenda cannot send you a reminder email advising of the approaching appointment either. As concrete and certain the written reminder may be, without some effort from the actual person, the appointment might still go unnoticed. Therein lies the most detrimental downfall of the agenda and its success as an appointment reminder. If it cannot remind without the person's own memory aiding the process then it seems to be inefficient as a full-proof method for reminders.

On the other hand we have the highly interactive PDA. Whether it is simply a PDA or a cell phone with PDA capabilities like a Blackberry, iPhone, Palm the calendar function is still superb. Using any of these PDAs a user can enter their appointment into the calendar and then simply remove it from their memory and worry. When the PDAs setting is triggered, whether one day or 15 minutes before the appointment, the PDA will notify the user. The forms of notification vary but the most common is a type of ring or beeping sound that will alert the user. Then there will appear a written reminder on the screen advising of the time, place, or reason for the appointment. The specificity of the reminder is dependent on the how much information the user entered when they created the appointment. It seems like there is no reason to even keep a written agenda with this great advancement, but there is always a downfall to anything.

A PDA is susceptible to many more forms of malfunctioning. A PDA is a like a small computer that cannot encounter any amount of water, because it will completely "fry" and lose all the information it contained. A PDA also may run the risk of running out of battery, and if this happens there will be no alert or access to the information at all (a very dangerous downfall). Yet, it seems that careful precautions can avoid these situations most of the time, and the only thing to worry about would be any accidental drops in puddles, or sinks, and allowing it to run out of battery without the power cord on hand.

It seems clear that for the careful and cautious user the better choice is the PDA. But if you happen to be the person that always jumps in the pool with your cell phone, or simply likes to have the security of a written document reminder, the the agend is for you. This is more of a person choice, but for those that are in between there is no question you should advance with technology and transfer from a written agenda to a PDA (of any sort).